What revolution?

We are back to our guest blogs! Queralt Ayuso Casajuana asks the question, What Revolution?




“In Iraq, A Kurdish Warrior-Diva Sings Against ISIS, Despite Threats”. That was the headline of the American National Public Radio upon 'Revolution''s release in 2015, the single by the Iraqi Kurdish pop star Helan Abdulla, or Helly Luv.

‘Revolution’ was recorded 3km away from the frontline between the Iraqi Peshmerga and Daesh. It begins in “a village somewhere in Kurdistan” where peaceful life is interrupted after Daesh throws a bomb. In the opposite direction of run-away citizens, walks Helly Luv in shiny golden high heels, and before the astonished civilians, she raises a banner with the words “Stop the violence” in front of a Daesh’s tank, reminding of Tiananmen’s iconic image.

This music video is one of those that you need to watch at least three times in order not to miss anything. And the more you watch it, the more you start to feel its contradictions. Still, the first impression one gets is that when women take up arms, they become amazingly powerful. There is a strong message of women as active agents in war, sweeping away the image of women as victims. Women fighting for equality and for their nation, doing what is usually associated with a male gender role. It is hard not to get seduced. However, after these three or four times, you can leave aside the euphoria of women warriors fighting Daesh and examine Helly Luv’s message more carefully.

A first question to ask is, who is the audience for Luv’s music video? The fact that both the lyrics and the messages on the banners are in English gives us a hint that the message targets a global audience. An audience of potential sympathizers to the Kurdish independence project that Helly Luv advocates for. ‘Revolution’ remains relevant to examine precisely because it is using a widespread narrative among sympathizers that to a significant extent, romanticizes the Kurdish struggle as heroic.   This romanticization has specifically put the Kurdish female fighter figure in the spotlight. Fashion magazines like Elle writing about Kurdish female fighters or H&M selling a jumpsuit that reminds of traditional peshmerga clothes are only symptoms of this fetishization. "Revolution” clearly emphasizes this image of the brave Kurdish female fighter, fearless and defiant, “kicking ISIS’s ass” as Vice stated.


While initially seeming empowering, this simplistic portrayal obscures the fact that both Kurdish men and women fighters exist in a conflict situation. Portraying the bearing of arms as something empowering by itself silences the human costs of violence. Moreover, as explained on an article in Al-Jazeera, this captivation for Kurdish female fighters ignores the “social revolution that preceded armed struggle” or "the fact that Kurdish women have been engaging in armed resistance for decades without anyone’s notice”. The Kurdish feminist movement does not comprise fighting Daesh alone, there is a whole political ideology behind, influenced by the ideas of Abdullah Öcalan (currently serving prison in Turkey), which includes, for instance, the science of women, known as Jineology, as an important part of the revolution.

The use of the described female fighter romanticization for nationalist aspirations is further problematic because it is framed within the global War on Terror. The reason behind is that the fight against Daesh is the perfect tool to win the audience’s sympathy. So in the music video context, the use of the War on Terror discourse feeds the existing romanticization which then translates into support for the Kurdish independence. Examining ‘Revolution’’s contradictory messages of war and peace helps us to see how the direct translation from fighting Daesh to getting sympathy is obtained.

Looking closely at Helly Luv’s outfit, we can notice her rifle-shaped rings or the two crossed bullet belts adorning her body. She also dances with an AK-47 rifle on top of a car and leads a disciplined troop of well-armed soldiers. This glorification of the aesthetics of violence collides with the banner’s messages asking to “Stop the war”. So war and peace are put together. There is an underlying idea that enforcing peace through violence is justified. Violence is acceptable when it is framed in terms of a just war.

This just war is obviously the War on Terror, which is made appealing by establishing a binary between good and bad. The peshmerga represent the good side defending freedom and equality while Daesh is the evil side trying to take all this away. Daesh fighters’ facelessness enables a dehumanization that in the end makes the killing of the enemy acceptable. But is the reality that clear-cut? Not according to Riches, who points out that the victim, observer, and perpetrator categories are fluid and can be embodied by the same person. This means that victims can also become perpetrators when taking up arms even if it is seen as justified. So the good-bad binary is, in reality, more nuance.


But this is not all the picture yet. Jumping to the global politics level, the sympathy for the Kurdish cause is illustrated through Western military training support for the Peshmerga (NATO and Anti-ISIS Global Coalition); political support as exemplified by this April’s “vow of solidarity with Kurdish authorities in Northern Syria by British officials”; or by the fact that the international community condemns foreign fighters joining Daesh but has been more laid back regarding “foreign volunteers” joining the People’s Defense Units in Syria or the Peshmerga in Iraq.

This should not be a surprise since it responds to global powers’ aim to legitimize the War on Terror by instrumentalizing the romanticization of the Kurdish struggle. As such, this support is only superficial (as the lack of international recognition to the Iraqi Kurdistan referendum proved in 2017), and thus not willing to stand for Kurdish aspirations.

After having watched more than twice Helly Luv’s music video, we can now ask ourselves what revolution is Helly Luv talking about?


Comments